Capitalism vs. Socialism: Comparing Economic Systems

Course No. 5006
Professor Edward F. Stuart, Ph.D.
Northeastern Illinois University
Share This Course
4.5 out of 5
75 Reviews
89% of reviewers would recommend this product
Course No. 5006
Streaming Included Free

What Will You Learn?

  • numbers Understand the differences-and surprisingly similarities-between economic systems and their underlying philosophies.
  • numbers See why there is no pure capitalist or socialist economy working in the world today.
  • numbers Explore the history and evolution of economic thought from the late 18th century to the current day.

Course Overview

All of the tradeoffs in competing economic systems—capitalism, socialism, and communism—are controversial. These systems and ideologies have undeniably shaped the way people view both the world today and modern history. But where does capitalism begin and socialism end? In short, it’s about choice and compromise.

Capitalism and socialism turn on the major societal issues of education, healthcare, social services, and taxation. And they raise civil liberties tradeoffs that weigh individual freedom against the social safety net and collective security. Because economics focuses on these pocketbook issues, many people believe the field is simply about money when, in reality, money is merely a means to an end. Economics is really about people and their lives, and societies have been in pursuit of the ideal system for centuries, one that can balance these ongoing, competing desires for freedom versus security. No one has found perfect equilibrium—the debates rage on and economies are in constant flux—but some major contenders have emerged, all of which are variations of capitalism and socialism in differing degrees and combinations. Determining which, if any, is the best possible option in a definitive way, however, is a Sisyphean task and one riddled with complications.

Understanding and endeavoring to solve these perpetual dilemmas is the job of comparative economics. By looking at the many economies around the world—their histories, their failures and successes—comparative economics attempts to uncover the influences, systems, and decisions that can do the most good for the most people. Guiding you through this complex web of values and theories is Edward F. Stuart, Professor Emeritus of Economics at Northeastern Illinois University, who is a specialist in both comparative economics and Russian and Eastern European studies. Professor Stuart has been traveling, teaching, and learning about these economic systems—in the former Soviet Union, the former Eastern Bloc, China, Scandinavia, and Europe—for more than 30 years. It could even be argued that he was born to be a comparative economist, raised in a household defined by the very debates he analyzes as personified in the libertarian views of his father and his mother’s social progressivism. This familial link to his subject offers a personal dimension to his approach, one that demonstrates his ongoing passion for the ways these debates play out on a global scale.

Economists venture to understand immensely complex systems that encompass not only finance and trade, but social structures, governments, family arrangements, geography, and more. The illuminating 24 lectures of Capitalism vs. Socialism: Comparing Economic Systems will show you the many ways the most influential modern economic theories were developed, how they function (or don’t), and how they manage to operate both together and in opposition to each other, from the rise of Soviet communism to the future of the European Union and beyond. As you compare and contrast the many ways societies tackle economic issues, Professor Stuart demonstrates that even the most controversial economic decisions boil down to a deceptively simple question: What makes a good society?

Measuring Success

One of the first misconceptions Professor Stuart clarifies is that there is no definitive way to determine if an economy is objectively “good” or “bad.” Rather, there are many statistics and data points economists can use to measure the relative health of a given system. From gross domestic product (GDP) to unemployment rates to inflation and even life expectancy, there is no shortage of measuring tools. The greatest difficulty lies not just in translating complex metrics, but in choosing which of these measurements matter. While discussion of GDP is common in the news, not everyone holds it as the absolute yardstick for economic success. And while few people would argue that low unemployment and low rates of inflation are good things for an economy, even fewer can agree as to whether either is a significant statistic to measure prosperity. As Professor Stuart notes, “people can argue forever using whatever statistics prove their point.”

If there are no foolproof conclusions to draw from the wealth of information available, how do we know when an economy “works”? What is more important, economic equality or rapid growth? Low inflation or infant mortality rates? As you progress through the history of capitalism, socialism, communism, and mixed-economies—and look at their manifestations across the world today—Professor Stuart will demonstrate that absolutes in economics are much like those in culture or politics: impossible and ultimately unhelpful. Rather, it is in finding balance, making comparisons and compromises, that economies discover how to prosper, stagnate, or, in some cases, collapse.

The Paradoxes of Prosperity

On the surface, the study of economics can seem like purely a numbers game, relying as it does on large-scale, impersonal statistics to focus attention on broad trends. This “big picture” approach can sometimes mean that the human costs of prosperity can be dismissed as simply the cost of doing business. Slavery and exploitation. Unsafe working conditions. Child labor. Government oppression. Rather than gloss over these and other issues, Capitalism vs. Socialism will take you across centuries and around the world to show you both sides of the story, diving into the history of economic systems and the individuals and groups that shaped them, whether they be famous industrialists like Josiah Wedgewood, notable economic thinkers like Adam Smith and Karl Marx, political leaders such as Stalin, FDR, or Otto von Bismarck, or the many nameless workers and citizens whose time and labor form the backbone of any economy.

If people are the real heart of economics, then it should be unsurprising that there are many paradoxes inherent in economic systems. Professor Stuart takes you through the many developments of modern economics and highlights that, while there are a host of advantages and disadvantages that must be balanced in any system, some roadblocks can arise from unexpected or counterintuitive elements. Some of these paradoxes include:

  • The necessity of strong government in free market systems. Successful, large-scale capitalist enterprise requires a strong central government to enforce property and contract laws.
  • The “paradox of thrift.” While it is smart for individuals and businesses to save and build up cash reserves to survive a recession, when the behavior becomes widespread it will eventually negatively affect total spending, incomes, production, employment, etc.
  • More money doesn’t equal more spending. Known as “marginal propensity to consume,” wealthy individuals demonstrate unstable spending habits, while poor people will almost always spend 100% (or even slightly more) of their income.
  • “All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others.” Professor Stuart highlights how, in his allegorical novel Animal Farm, George Orwell underscores an irony of communism in practice, wherein everyone is said to be equal but a rigid hierarchy of power exists nonetheless.

Economic History

Capitalism and socialism (and by extension, communism) are often treated as if they are always in opposition to each other, but by looking at their origins and development, you will discover that this is far from the truth; they are, in fact, inextricably connected. Many social, political, and even religious factors intersected to support the birth of capitalism at a time when new, more democratic political systems were emerging from under the oppressive shadow of feudalism. In turn, modern socialism is the direct result of the pitfalls of free-market capitalism in the 18th and 19th centuries—the exploitation and dangerous, impoverished conditions workers were often subjected to inspired reformers and political thinkers to envision new ways to create a better, more equal society. Meanwhile, other nations took socialist ideology to an extreme in various forms of authoritarian communism. Professor Stuart looks closely at these systems and their histories, revealing their strengths and weaknesses and demonstrating why there is no pure capitalist (or pure socialist) system working in the world today.

As Professor Stuart guides you through the origins and evolutions of economic thought, you will look at some of the greatest experiments and failures of the last few centuries, including the creation of early American socialist experiments, the far-reaching economic implications of World War I, how the Great Depression highlighted the instability of post-war markets, the rise and fall of Soviet communism, the mixed-model economies of Europe, the rising tide of Asian market economies, and much more. Along the way, he also shares insightful personal stories and reveals unexpected connections between economics and other facets of modern life and culture. Throughout the lectures, you will find answers to questions like:

  • Where do phrases like “when my ship comes in” and “there’s no such thing as a free lunch” originate?
  • What is the correlation between the average physical height of a population and economic growth?
  • Why are the goldsmiths of the middle ages so important in the history of modern economics?
  • Where does the concept of the money-back guarantee come from?
  • What is the link between a 19th-century socialist experiment and the microwave?
  • How did novelists like Theodore Dreiser, Upton Sinclair, Charles Dickens, and George Orwell influence the arguments surrounding various economic systems?
  • What can rock music and the Rubik’s cube tell us about post-World War II capitalism?

The End of History?

In the end, what does make a good society? If every nation, every community, and even every individual across the globe assigns a different value to the tradeoffs of social solidarity and individual freedom that define economic systems, how do we predict the future of world economies? Hundreds of economies operate side by side and every single one has advantages and disadvantages that cannot be objectively measured.

As Professor Stuart observes, we are not at the end of history; many of the questions we ask today will continue to be asked far into the future. What comparative economics promises is not a “final” form of human government or the ultimate economic plan, but rather the opportunity to uncover the ways societies have shaped—and will continue to shape—the world to fit the boundless ideals that make a good society, and what each option can tell us about ourselves, the world we live in, and the world we want to create.

Hide Full Description
24 lectures
 |  Average 30 minutes each
  • 1
    Gorbachev's Hello and the Soviet Goodbye
    Begin your foray into comparative economics with a look at the USSR in the final few years before its collapse and the restructuring known as perestroika, which led to an increased interest in the study of capitalism versus socialism in the U.S. Examine some of the major questions that shape economic systems and close with a brief overview of the goals and scope of the course. x
  • 2
    Adam Smith, Karl Marx, Keynes, and Friedman
    Meet four of the most influential economic thinkers in history: Adam Smith, Karl Marx, John Maynard Keyes, and Milton Friedman. As you examine their individual philosophies and influences across three centuries, you may be surprised by how many of their ideas overlap even as their philosophies differ. x
  • 3
    How to Argue GDP, Inflation, and Other Data
    From GDP and inflation to unemployment and standard of living, there is no one absolute measurement that determines the health of an economy. Get an overview of the different metrics for economic success and a general understanding of how they are calculated and interpreted—and why these data points can start more arguments than they resolve. x
  • 4
    British Revolution: Industry and Labor
    Travel to the birthplace of industrial capitalism: Great Britain in the 18th and 19th centuries. A fortuitous meeting of politics, technology, and economics would shape the future and give the world innovations like insurance, corporate ownership and investment, and extended payment systems. It would also inspire writers like Charles Dickens to reveal the horrifying social repercussions of unregulated industrialization. x
  • 5
    American Capitalism: Hamilton and Jefferson
    Modern capitalism may have been born in England, but America would be defined by it from the very beginning. Look at some of the paradoxes inherent in free market systems and how Protestant religious philosophy played a significant part in the direction of the economy. Then, see how founding figures like Hamilton and Jefferson set the course for American economic dominance in the years to come. x
  • 6
    Utopian Socialism to Amana Microwave Ovens
    The many opportunities and innovations of capitalism in the U.S. did not come without a cost. Religious and political thinkers alike turned to new solutions to alleviate the often horrible conditions many workers experienced, resulting in socialist projects that fell into two camps: utopian and scientific. Close with a look at the difficulties inherent in running socialist systems in a largely market economy. x
  • 7
    The Bolsheviks: Lenin, Trotsky, and Stalin
    Examine the ways Stalin sought to exercise complete control of the Soviet economy, focusing on his Five-Year Plan for production—an object lesson in the complexities of anticipating and satisfying the material needs of a society. Professor Stuart also gives you an eye-opening look at the ways economics and politics can feed off of one another. Or, in this case, starve each other. x
  • 8
    Soviet Planning and 1,000 Left-Foot Shoes
    Examine the ways Stalin sought to exercise complete control of the Soviet economy, focusing on his Five-Year Plan for production- an object lesson in the complexities of anticipating and satisfying the material needs of a society. Professor Stuart also gives you an eye-opening look at the ways economics and politics can feed off of one another. Or, in this case, starve each other. x
  • 9
    Economic Consequences of European Peace
    The end of World War I illustrates one of the iron laws of capitalism: upheavals in one part of the world have repercussions all around it. Understand how the Treaty of Versailles set up harsh terms for a depleted Germany and why shortsighted leadership from the Allied powers led to economic fallout and, eventually, the second World War. x
  • 10
    How FDR and Keynes Tried to Save Capitalism
    Was the stock market crash of 1929 the cause of the Great Depression? Find out why Black Tuesday was actually a symptom rather than a cause and trace the origins of the Depression in the U.S. to events and policies of the 1920s, both domestic and international. Then, look at the ways FDR applied the ideas of John Maynard Keynes to help America recover from economic devastation. x
  • 11
    Social Democracy in Europe
    In the wake of economic and social turmoil in the 19th century, some European countries sought to reform the capitalist system and make it more sustainable. Examine the different motives behind the reforms, understand the differences between public and private goods, and compare and contrast the myriad ways economies can blend capitalism and socialism. x
  • 12
    Sweden's Mixed Economy Model
    Called “The Third Way” by some economists, the economic system of Sweden is perhaps the best example of a philosophy that falls between the extremes of free market capitalism and government-controlled socialism. Professor Stuart explains the many factors that have contributed to Sweden’s relative economic success and what it can teach us about mixed economies. x
  • 13
    French Indicative Planning and Jean Monnet
    Discover why France, a latecomer to industrial capitalism, was vital in shaping influential socialist theories, and how centuries of political upheaval can leave distinct impressions on a nation's economic history. From the French Revolution to World War II and beyond, France is a strong example of the ways economies are shaped by both internal and external forces. x
  • 14
    British Labour Party and National Health
    The British economy has vacillated between privatization and nationalization over time. Here you will look at one of these shifts by first examining the socialist programs introduced by a post-World War II Labour Party government (including the National Health Service), followed by the Margaret Thatcher era of deregulations and privatizations. x
  • 15
    Social Welfare in Germany: Bismarck to Kohl
    Socialist policies are not limited to the realm of idealists and reformers. Germany under Otto von Bismarck shows how socialist policies like public education, unemployment benefits, and tax-funded healthcare can be used to create more efficient workforces. See how Bismarck's ideas were used to help Germany achieve greater political power and trace the echoes of his legacy into the 20th century under Chancellor Helmut Kohl. x
  • 16
    Soviet Bloc: Conformity and Resistance
    After World War II, the Allied powers were divided by their economic policies, resulting in a divided Europe. Examine the ways Soviet Russia dominated the nations of Eastern Europe, bringing them under the umbrella of authoritarian communism, and which nations pushed back against this takeover. In contrast, also look at the policies and institutions put in place by the Western allies to rebuild Europe. x
  • 17
    Two Germanies: A Laboratory in Economics
    The post-war occupation of Germany by four separate powers—and the difficult question of how to avoid the problems that stemmed from the Treaty of Versailles just a few decades earlier—created a division that would dominate Europe for more than four decades. It also created a unique opportunity for direct comparison between communist and capitalist enterprise, which you will take advantage of here. x
  • 18
    The Soviet Union's Fatal Failure to Reform
    Despite attempts by some Soviet leaders in the mid-to-late 20th century, Russia was never able to successfully reform the oppressive and increasingly inefficient Soviet communist system. Professor Stuart shows how the authoritarian government encouraged dysfunctional behavior in production and why the resulting scarcity of decent goods and services ultimately became unsupportable. x
  • 19
    “Blinkered and Bankrupt” in Eastern Europe
    In retrospect, it would seem that communism in Eastern Europe was doomed to fail. However, when the communist governments began to collapse in the 1980s, it took many people in the West by surprise. Trace the ways Soviet communism's failures were replicated over and over again in the Eastern Bloc nations, with nearly the same results for each of them. x
  • 20
    From Chairman Mao to the Capitalist Roaders
    Professor Stuart turns his attention to China, focusing on the 20th-century influence of Soviet communism under leaders like Mao Zedong. Look at the ways China was shaped by its earlier history to be especially unprepared for industrialization on the Soviet scale and how the cultural revolution under Mao further impeded progress, eventually resulting in an overthrow of his ideas after his death. x
  • 21
    After Deng, China Privatizes and Globalizes
    How was China able to make the dramatic transformation from a nation in decline to a global economic powerhouse in just a few decades? Contrast the economic reforms under “capitalist roader” Deng Xiaoping against the earlier communist strategy under Mao, as well as against the unsuccessful attempts at similar reform in Russia under Gorbachev. Close with a look at China’s economic influence on the world stage. x
  • 22
    Asian Tigers: Wealth and State Control
    Reveal the secrets behind the remarkable transformations of the “Asian Tiger” countries of South Korea, Taiwan, and Singapore from poor countries to high-income economies in the span of 50 years. Starting with their shared features, trace their progression from authoritarian regimes to more democratic governments and compare and contrast their concentrated efforts to shape their economies. x
  • 23
    European Union: Success or Failure?
    While the European Union has been a spectacular success in its fundamental mission—preventing war between major European powers—here you will also look at the other ways it could be considered a failure. Professor Stuart presents the post-war conditions under which the EU was created and the dimensions of its economic influence, for good and ill, throughout Europe. x
  • 24
    Both Sides Now: Experiment in Slovenia
    What does the future hold for economies around the world? Using Slovenia as a model, explore some of the crucial questions concerning the evolution of world economies. Are economies becoming more similar? Or are they diverging? Is there even a clear-cut answer? The issues and debates that opened the course come full circle here; definitive answers remain elusive, but the tools provided open up a world of possibilities. x

Lecture Titles

Clone Content from Your Professor tab

What's Included

What Does Each Format Include?

Video DVD
Instant Video Includes:
  • Download 24 video lectures to your computer or mobile app
  • Downloadable PDF of the course guidebook
  • FREE video streaming of the course from our website and mobile apps
Video DVD
DVD Includes:
  • 24 lectures on 4 DVDs
  • 280-page printed course guidebook
  • Downloadable PDF of the course guidebook
  • FREE video streaming of the course from our website and mobile apps
  • Closed captioning available

What Does The Course Guidebook Include?

Video DVD
Course Guidebook Details:
  • 280-page printed course guidebook
  • Photos and illustrations
  • Suggested reading
  • Questions to consider

Enjoy This Course On-the-Go with Our Mobile Apps!*

  • App store App store iPhone + iPad
  • Google Play Google Play Android Devices
  • Kindle Fire Kindle Fire Kindle Fire Tablet + Firephone
*Courses can be streamed from anywhere you have an internet connection. Standard carrier data rates may apply in areas that do not have wifi connections pursuant to your carrier contract.

Your professor

Edward F. Stuart

About Your Professor

Edward F. Stuart, Ph.D.
Northeastern Illinois University
Edward F. Stuart is a Professor Emeritus of Economics at Northeastern Illinois University, where he has been a member of the faculty since 1986. He earned his Ph.D. in Economics at the University of Oklahoma, specializing in International Economics and Russian and Eastern European Studies. He teaches courses in international economics, the economics of the European Union, comparative economic systems, European economic...
Learn More About This Professor
Also By This Professor


Capitalism vs. Socialism: Comparing Economic Systems is rated 4.5 out of 5 by 74.
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Excellent series I just finished lecture 24 and am so grateful to Professor Stuart for his excellent teaching style and his ability to make economics understandable. I learned so much..
Date published: 2020-03-05
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Capitalism VS Socialism I finished viewing all the lectures. Excellent presentation. Very informative. I wish the liberals would take the course.
Date published: 2020-03-05
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Comprehensive Very interesting. Analysis of different economic systems engaging
Date published: 2020-03-02
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Great lectures I found the course to be very educational especially in our current election environment. I am retired and was never an economist but was amazed at how the instructor held my attention to all 24 chapters.
Date published: 2020-02-29
Rated 5 out of 5 by from no more reviews for the tc. I wrote a review and it was never published. I will not be writing anymore reviews for the tc.
Date published: 2020-02-10
Rated 5 out of 5 by from A Fair-Minded, Balanced Course; Very Interesting This is a very Interesting course by a strong, effective lecturer; it's a balanced presentation (for those not imprisoned by ideology) of the strengths and weaknesses of various economic systems on the continuum from pure capitalism to pure socialism. Back in 1989-1991 during the implosion of the socialist Soviet bloc nations, as well as a wave of privatizations of previously nationalized sectors in capitalist western Europe, a course like this would seem obsolete. Courses in Comparative Economics before these climactic events would compare "market economies" with "command economies." Today, socialism seems to have regained some favor in certain quarters: surveys of millennials show a strong percentage with favorable views of socialism (however they define it), liberal writers refer to "late-stage capitalism" (whatever that means), and some left-wing politicians in a major party proudly call themselves "socialist." Professor Stuart shows that the pure versions of capitalism and socialism can be contrasted along two major dimensions: capitalism exhibits private ownership (e.g., shareholders) of the means of production and allocation of resources through market prices; socialism exhibits social ownership (e.g., government, cooperatives) of the means of production and allocation of resources through economic (central) planning. Furthermore, in considering the two major elements of economic performance, production and distribution, capitalism does well in producing a great variety of goods, but not so well in producing "public goods" and generates inequalities in income and wealth that many find unacceptable in a democratic society. In contrast, the historical trajectory of socialism shows it can jump-start an industrializing economy by targeting growth in the capital good sector, but eventually growth is slowed by inefficiencies in economic planning and there are usually drastic shortages in consumer goods; the distribution of income may be less unequal (there's no ownership of financial assets), but more equal shares of a smaller pie is problematic. In addition, capitalism is more dynamic and entrepreneurial but beset by economic cycles as reflected in periods of mass unemployment and inflation, whereas socialism due to the economic controls of planning has minimal unemployment and stable prices but at the expense of a stable (stagnant) economy generating few consumer goods and a mediocre standard of living. The advocate of the private market mechanism (after Hayek) would refer to its generating a kind of "spontaneous order," while Professor Stuart reminds us that the "uncoordinated" actions of many producers can induce economic volatility. This course is more of a historical review of various economic systems, primarily in Europe, but I would have preferred if he included a more analytical focus as well (admittedly, historical results are a good empirical test). For example: (1) a consideration of the viability of "market socialism" (the economic calculation debate) where social ownership is joined to a market mechanism that allocates scarce resources "priced" by inventory accumulation / depletion, (2) a comparison of resource allocation between the capital markets of capitalist nations and the planning agencies of socialist or semi-capitalist nations; he mentions the success of the "Asian Tigers" in the government's targeting of key growth industries, and (3) an evaluation of whether it's possible to sustain political freedom and democracy in an economy that exhibits very extensive economic controls and state ownership. Professor Stuart fairly concludes this course by noting that the best economic system for a nation, which amounts to the optimal mix of private and public activity, reflects a nation's history and values. Some nations emphasize notions of social solidarity, economic security, and the provision of public goods and are willing to pay for these items in much higher taxes (e.g., Scandinavia). Other nations prefer a substantial amount of economic freedom and access to many private goods, and prefer lower taxes (e.g., much of the Anglo-American world).
Date published: 2020-01-29
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Capitalism Vs. Socialism I bought this recently because one that I was going to borrow from a friend was being watched. I have watched about 1/3 of it and am very happy about it. It delves very deeply into issues that I have only briefly covered in my education and life. The distinctions are very clear and it reinforces with fact, my early belief that I had at least a fundamental knowledge of the material. The deeper dive and the level of detail is just fantastic. I needed to know this stuff.
Date published: 2020-01-09
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Capitalism vs. Socialism Very topical. Presents the pros and cons of both systems in an objective way with no bias. I felt like the lecturer was in my living room talking to me. I was previously acquainted with the subject but still learned a lot.
Date published: 2019-12-29
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Outstanding Content and Instructor I have purchased a number of courses during the last couple of years. This is by far, the best course I have purchased. The instructor is outstanding.
Date published: 2019-12-23
Rated 4 out of 5 by from Well informed The lecturer is very well informed and interesting. The 24 lectures might be improved by being abbreviated to about 16.
Date published: 2019-12-19
Rated 4 out of 5 by from Deep economic thinkers! Covers a wide range of questions relating to the comparison of Capitalist and Socialist economic systems and provides a very useful summary of economic theories from Adam Smith to the Chicago School with many examples of their application. I could have used some graphs and charts in the transcript notes.
Date published: 2019-12-19
Rated 3 out of 5 by from Big picture, elementary level, historical survey This is a top level, historical survey of the economic systems employed by various political entities, mostly over the past 100 years. I was expecting a more in depth comparison of capitalism vs socialism, instead of mostly a narration of economic and political history. As a person who grew up in the early stages of the cold war, I didn't learn much new, but the course did refresh my memories. For someone who wants an overall, historical economic framework, this is a good course, that's just not what I was expecting. Perhaps a point of the course is that relatively simple economic ideas have profound consequences on peoples' economic well being, and their safety such as whether they suffer violent or peaceful consequences from the implementation of relatively simple economic ideas.
Date published: 2019-11-23
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Interesting and comprehensible The lecturer makes this material much more interesting, even exciting, than the lecturers I had on these topics in college.
Date published: 2019-11-14
Rated 4 out of 5 by from Not Exactly Capitalism vs. Socialism I was somewhat disappointed in the course. I thought the course would delve deeply into a compare and contrast of the two economic systems. It really wasn't that. It is more an economic history of several countries - which is very interesting, but not what I thought the course was going to focus on. The professor doesn't often summarize, or step back and state, e.g., "this feature is characteristic of most socialist/capitalist systems". I think it is often obvious whether or not the feature he is discussing is socialistic or capitalistic, it's just that he seems to avoid making that judgement. He'll frequently use phrases like "market economy" or "welfare", but doesn't highlight the feature by explicitly using the words capitalism or socialism. I'm not sure why, when that is the title of the entire course. I think the professor tries to be balanced, but his slight bias toward social programs is apparent (e.g., concern for income inequality, welfare issues, etc.). He once stated, "One of the cruel aspects of capitalism is ..." I don't recall him ever describing a feature of socialism as cruel. I don't think this slight bias significantly detracts from the overall quality of the course. Every lecturer is going to have some kind of bias that comes out. I think the professor is an excellent speaker, is very clear and not rushed in his presentation, and he is likeable. He brings out several economic principles throughout the lectures, and the lectures are interesting, giving nice summaries to histories and economies of several countries. What I was looking for, that is mostly absent, was the type of question the professor poses in the last lecture. He asks, "But do all the factors contributing to Slovenia's economic and social success have to do with adopting a free market, capitalist system?" I wish he had posed such questions for all the countries he discussed. He didn't. And he really didn't answer this question in the last lecture. He says it's complicated. OK, but after reviewing the subject, please give an opinion and answer the question, or at least give some perspective of your opinion. I don't mind if you have a bias, one way or another, but please give the reasons for your opinion. Despite his slight bias, I think the professor sincerely believes that there is no one right system, that countries make choices based on their values and culture. And I think he supports that thesis well throughout the lectures. I guess I was hoping for more of an intellectual debate of the two systems. That is, when a critical or glowing statement is made about one system, what does the other side have to say, supported with reasons and examples. This course is not that. Perhaps it should have been entitled, "Comparative Economic Systems of the World: An Historical Perspective". So, I recommend the course. You will definitely learn several things. Just be aware of what the course does and does not do.
Date published: 2019-09-25
Rated 5 out of 5 by from A good review of political economics Dr. Stuart present a lively and personal review and is reasonably fair in his comments. He does present it all from an American view, a bit different from my Scandinavian backgroud, but overall, a fair assessment and all the basics are covered.
Date published: 2019-09-24
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Clearly and thoroughly explores subject. Edward F. Stuart is a first class lecturer. He is clear, concise, interesting , informative, and a joy to listen to. I would want to take any course he gives.
Date published: 2019-09-10
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Good sensible overview Well-presented, sensible overview of the subject. Following its title, it focuses on strictly economic issues, with just an occasional acknowledgement that different measures of success exist, such as freedom and general quality of life. Rightly, it emphasizes that all modern economies are a mixture of public and private, directed "planned") and free-market. The professor has lived enough time in communist countries to understand first-hand the problems there. I wish he'd not let one annoying error slip by: a map repeatedly shown in late lectures has Bulgaria labeled as Belarus.
Date published: 2019-08-08
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Very Well Done, Instructive and Informative Sixty years ago I graduated with a double major: math and economics. Now at age 81 I thought I would give this series a try. A wonderful review of the world's economic systems. The professor presenting the material does a great job relating not only the material but adding personal insights as well. Really well done.
Date published: 2019-07-19
Rated 5 out of 5 by from I bought the book to get more information about the actual system we have and the uprising of Socialists and people that claim, "take the money from the rich ones and give it to the poor ones." So, I wanted to know about the other systems in the world and the course covers most of them, as I understand. Good insight and information.
Date published: 2019-07-15
Rated 4 out of 5 by from Not exactly what I expected What I expected was a Column A vs. Column B comparison of the advantages and disadvantages of Capitalism and Socialism. Instead the Professor chose to present anecdotal examples of countries (and dates) with Capitalism or Socialism or some hybrid combination of the two. This was also a good style of presentation - more understandable, but not the "summing up" comparison that I was expecting.
Date published: 2019-05-15
Rated 5 out of 5 by from An Overview of Improtant Historical Examples From the beginning it should be clear that the stance of the professor on this very polarizing subject is as such: He sees full economic planning and price fixating as inefficient at least and disastrous at worst. Yet he supports the Keynesian stimulation of consumption and central banking to keep financial stability; He doesn’t categorically oppose the strategic use of tariffs but points the connection between extreme isolationism and economic stagnation; and he favors egalitarianism as a generally positive value. That is also my own view so of course I sympathize with the professor. I believe that naturally, people who differ from that view will find this course harder to swallow but if they are open-minded will find it very useful. For appreciating what we got here one should understand the narrow yet rich in details scope of the course: Its NOT a course that: - compares Socialist and Capitalist as ideologies, nor does it delve much into economic theories. It takes the approach of looking at historical examples, of seeing the results of natural experiments. - It's not a body count. It doesn't goes into length of the horrors of the Gulags, The great leap forward, Pol Pot, Etc… nor does it mention the Irish Famine or the CIA-supported Indonesian mass killings of 1965–66. There is some overview of some political events but this course is interested less with oppression and war and more with economic growth and stability. - This course overlook some important questions like: Does corporate capitalism is a free market economy? Does strong trade unions compatible with a flexible labor market? But it makes a good job in drawing the different shades of market economies, of social-democracy and even of the bit softer shades of eastern European Communisms. - the questions of monopoly and labor market flexibility stays aside, as the questions of post-colonialism, ecological sustainability, and the cultural critiques of affluent society by the likes of Galbraith (the professor favorite economist), Veblen, Ivan Illich, the Frankfurt School and the French Situationists, but the discussion stay wide and interesting thanks to the approach of telling historical narratives. - That course actually doesn’t compare economic systems much of the time as it gives historical examples which are useful and quiet essential to any discussion about comparing capitalism and socialism. Even in that regard I feel some important examples are missing. For example: - Switzerland is surrounded by high-taxes social-democratic economies yet this arguably most democratic country in the world lead a quiet conservative economic policy. - my own native Israel performed an economic miracle in the 50's and early 60's when under a socialist government with a big state-owned sector and big strong labor union it succeeded in receiving immigrating population 2-3 times its population size, fighting and recovering a few wars and developing a moden market economy and a welfare state (not as generous as in west Europe but still much better then what you would find on the then-socialist Egypt or India). Post-war Japan in another fascinating example. - The telling story of Venezuela since the oil-rich 50's to now mass famine under populist Chaves is glaringly missing. Yet even after mentioning everything this course is not, I found it interesting every minute, insightful, informative with much overlooked important details. It is interesting not only from the economic view but also as course on modern world history.
Date published: 2019-04-21
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Timely Topic Good overview of capitalism, socialism, and various blends from around the world. Having this introductory level of knowledge might enhance current political rhetoric. Although some reviewers felt it minimized the atrocities under communism and socialism, the inefficiencies and tendency for unchecked political power to form under such systems seemed pretty obvious in the presentation. For capitalism to continue successfully we must recognize it's strengths, but also it's weaknesses and why other systems might have appeal.
Date published: 2019-04-09
Rated 3 out of 5 by from Disappointed Of the many Great Courses I have viewed or listened to I found this on less organized and leaving me wanting the answers to questions that I expected to be addressed but were not. Transitions between the end of one segment and the beginning of another were absent as is usual with most courses. The Professor felt the need to include a lot of anecdotal information about his experiences and travels but little actual scholarship, making the course more about him than the subject matter. The real problem is that I feel that I did not walk away understanding much that is useful after listening to this course.
Date published: 2019-04-08
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Good compliment to Thinking About Capitalism I absolutely loved the Thinking About Capitalism course and thought this course was enjoyable. Both courses do explain the role government intervention has played in capitalist economies with either direct nationalization of industries, protection for workers or the welfare state in general. I personally love free market capitalism but these two courses have sought to show there is more than a capitalism (private) or socialism (government) dichotomy in the reality of economics. All capitalist systems have a form of welfare state capitalism that provides social services for their respective populations and pure socialism often has a hint of capitalism or market functions in them. Professor Mueller talks about that by saying it's ideology that wants to call the Nordic countries socialist rather than capitalist societies and Prof Stuart does the same thing when saying those same countries depend on private enterprise. Prof Stuart spent a lot of time in Communist countries so his insight into their economies were interesting. Unlike many of the negative comments I have seen here, I do not think he completely whitewashes the atrocities or negative aspects of Socialism. After hearing his lectures on the Soviet Union and the shortages their system had, I would not want to live in that. He talks about the disasters of Mao's Great Leap Forward and Cultural Revolution, especially from an economic perspective. And when talking about the large social safety nets of European countries (which he does praise), he also talks about how much those people pay in taxes to get to that. The guy clearly favors Keynesian economic policy, but I feel he was not as biased as people have suggested. It is a good compliment to Thinking About Capitalism where Prof Mueller has more sympathy to Hayek and the Austrian or Chicago Schools of thought. As far as presentation and delivery, Prof Stuart had a great delivery and good personal anecdotes of his own experiences which help us relate to the topics being discussed. I enjoyed this course and felt it could have been longer.
Date published: 2019-03-12
Rated 5 out of 5 by from This was an exceptional course in simplifying the various economic systems of the world. It is all too common to refer to any one of them without really understanding what they are about. Professor Stuart is a great communicator and never boring. He reduces complexity and makes learning a pleasure.
Date published: 2019-03-01
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Super value I love listening on a long or short trip. It makes the time go by and is interesting to listen.
Date published: 2019-02-28
Rated 5 out of 5 by from The best of the best I read first the book and then I listened to the lectures. The analysis and comparison of the economic systems-capitalism versus socialism is outstanding. I was born and grew up in Greece.I came to USA at the age of 24 to continue my education. Through my life, I am 74 years old, I have lived under different economic systems and governments. I have experiences the pro and con of socialism and capitalism. During my years in Greece we moved from Democratic free market government to dictatorship by the Generals back to free market economy, changing to socialism, later on joining and becoming a member of EU. Presently Greece has a socialistic government, and is financially bankrupt . The professor is doing an outstanding job comparing the different socioeconomic systems indicating the strengths and the weakness of the different systems. The information of this course is very valuable and it will provide the reader with an accurate knowledge of the different economic systems.
Date published: 2019-02-24
Rated 4 out of 5 by from A fair comparison I enjoyed the course. Dr. Stuart delivers the material well.
Date published: 2019-02-08
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Excellent Presentation I bought this to obtain a greater understanding of the contrasts between Socialism and Capitalism. The material is presented by country and provides an interesting history of each philosophy and the blending of the two philosophies in many countries.
Date published: 2019-02-05
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Excellent Course But Mistitled I agree with those reviewers who found Prof. Stuart to be a witty, articulate lecturer with a smooth and pleasant speaking style, and I think he has done an admirable job in this course of providing a series of recent economic histories of various countries around the world. What I expected but is largely missing is a qualitative comparison of the economic systems of those countries, a more direct examination and analysis of more capitalist-oriented systems versus more socialist-oriented systems, and a discussion of the course title's competing economic theories (the TGC's Thinking About Capitalism course is far better on this latter point). That said, the material is well-presented, expertly chosen, and very interesting and informative. While Prof. Stuart is clearly not an apostle of laissez-faire capitalism, he avoids overt politicization of the material. For those without a need for a map, I think the audio version of the course is entirely adequate. Highly recommended!
Date published: 2019-01-15
  • y_2020, m_10, d_18, h_16
  • bvseo_bulk, prod_bvrr, vn_bulk_3.0.12
  • cp_2, bvpage2n
  • co_hasreviews, tv_4, tr_70
  • loc_en_US, sid_5006, prod, sort_[SortEntry(order=SUBMISSION_TIME, direction=DESCENDING)]
  • clientName_teachco
  • bvseo_sdk, p_sdk, 3.2.0
  • CLOUD, getContent, 16.13ms

Questions & Answers

Customers Who Bought This Course Also Bought